J. Brumm
To Win
F. Jiang
To Win
Jeremy Beale vs Jacob Brumm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Beale 1 - 0 Brumm
They have played 2 sets in total, with Beale winning 2 and Brumm winning 0. The last match between Beale and Brumm was at the M25 Darwin, 15-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jeremy Beale getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeremy Beale | 1 |
| Jacob Brumm | 0 |
M25 Darwin(15-09-2023)
6
2
6
3
| Beale | Stats | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 821 | Ranking | 662 |
| 459 | Highest Rank | 616 |
| 30 | Age | 26 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 57% (139-105) | Career Total W/L | 52% (142-131) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jacob Brumm
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:28:0 | Average Match Time | 1:28:0 |
| 63% (40/63) | 1st Serve % | 67% (29/43) |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (21/29) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 37% (16/43) | Return Points Win % | 32% (20/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeremy Beale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jake Delaney
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Pavle Marinkov
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Kokoro Isomura
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jeremy Beale
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
0
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jacob Brumm
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Thomas Fancutt
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Jeremy Beale
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Brumm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Jacob Brumm
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Elijah Strode
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Jacob Brumm
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kase Schinnerer
Player
Jacob Brumm
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
5
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Jacob Brumm
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco Hermida
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve %
94%
(
46 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (139/105) | Win/Loss | 52% (142/131) |
| 56% (304/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (323/290) |
| 52% (2593/2380) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2904/2686) |
| 59% (109/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (119/100) |
| 55% (22/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (19/20) |
| 20% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 54% (7/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 773 | Aces Total | 411 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 580 | Total Double Faults | 541 |
| 1:9:12 | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
| 504.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 322.03 |
| 66% (8380/12649) | 1st Serve % | 58% (6564/11243) |
| 67% (5615/8380) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (4298/6564) |
| 49% (2091/4267) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2260/4679) |
| 42% (511/1208) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (496/1145) |
| 40% (4870/12305) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4592/11329) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (7/14) | Challenger W/L | 27% (6/16) |
| 59% (132/91) | Futures W/L | 54% (136/115) |
| 59% (137/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (141/266) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 55% (29/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (31/49) |
| 59% (34/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (30/66) |
| 86% (143/123) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (147/126) |
| 14% (143/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (147/21) |
| 16% (101/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (126/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
